Representative Adrian Smith introduces H.R. 11029: Bringing Rehabilitation, Integrated Delivery, and Greater Extended Care at Home Act

We have received text from H.R. 11029: Bringing Rehabilitation, Integrated Delivery, and Greater Extended Care at Home Act. This bill was received on 2026-11-12, and currently has 1 cosponsor.

Here is a short summary of the bill:

This bill would create a new Medicare pilot program that lets some people who would normally get skilled nursing facility care in a nursing home instead receive that care at home for a five-year period starting January 1, 2027.

What the program does

The Secretary of Health and Human Services would run a “SNF-at-Home” program under Medicare. Under this program, approved providers could deliver covered skilled nursing facility services to eligible Medicare patients in the patient’s residence instead of in a facility.

The bill says the program would be available only to people already eligible for skilled nursing facility care under Medicare Part A.

Who could provide the care

The bill defines “eligible entities” as:

• skilled nursing facilities; and
• certain hospitals that have agreements to provide skilled nursing facility services, if they also have transfer arrangements with a skilled nursing facility in case a patient can no longer safely stay at home.

Rules and safeguards

The bill would require the Secretary to waive some current Medicare and regulatory requirements so that care can be delivered at home. At the same time, it sets a number of conditions meant to keep the program similar in quality and safety to facility-based care.

Providers would have to:

• treat patients at home using the same standard of care as in a skilled nursing facility;
• meet safety standards set by the Secretary;
• use evidence-based rules for deciding who is eligible and when a patient should be moved to a facility;
• provide an individualized care plan that can include nursing, therapy, physician oversight, pharmacy, lab, imaging, equipment, supplies, nutrition, and social services;
• offer 24-hour access to a registered nurse and a clinician who can issue orders;
• have emergency response and transport plans;
• maintain infection control, medication management, home safety, backup power/technology, and abuse prevention standards;
• report serious events such as deaths, injuries, falls, medication errors, and missed visits; and
• submit to readiness reviews and unannounced oversight.

Patient choice and caregiver protections

The bill would make participation voluntary. Before care begins, the patient would have to receive written and oral notice explaining the program, alternatives, possible cost-sharing, time limits, transfer options, appeal rights, and the right to revoke consent.

The bill also says providers could not pressure patients to join the program, give financial inducements, or prefer one discharge option over another because of the patient’s decision. Providers also could not require an unpaid caregiver to be available or shift the cost or responsibility of care onto that caregiver.

Transfers back to a facility if needed

Providers would have to keep checking whether care can still be safely given at home. If not, they would have to arrange a prompt transfer to a skilled nursing facility. The bill says that transfer would not affect the patient’s Medicare eligibility for skilled nursing facility services.

If services are ended because a caregiver is no longer available or housing conditions change, the provider would have to arrange a safe transition and give written notice and access to expedited review.

Payment

Medicare would pay for services under the program using the usual payment rules for skilled nursing facilities, paid from the Hospital Insurance Trust Fund. The bill also directs the Secretary to avoid duplicate payments for the same services under this or other federal health programs.

Study and reporting

By September 30, 2030, the Secretary would have to study the program and compare home-based care with facility-based care. The study would look at:

• quality of care and health outcomes;
• hospital readmissions, mortality, infection rates, length of stay, and transfers between home and hospital;
• staffing mix and intensity of services;
• costs of home-based versus facility-based care; and
• patient, caregiver, and socioeconomic characteristics of people in the program.

The Secretary would also have to account for selection bias as much as possible when comparing participants with nonparticipants.

Implementation

The Secretary would be allowed to implement the program by program instruction or other administrative means, without waiting for additional legislation.

Relevant Companies

• ENSG - The Ensign Group, which operates skilled nursing facilities and home health/post-acute care businesses that could be affected by a shift of some Medicare skilled nursing care from facilities to home settings.
• AMED - Amedisys, which provides home health and related services and could see changes in demand if more skilled nursing-level care is delivered at home.
• UNH - UnitedHealth Group, through its Medicare Advantage and care-delivery businesses, could be affected by changes in Medicare post-acute care patterns and reimbursement administration.
• HUM - Humana, as a major Medicare Advantage insurer, could be indirectly affected by changes in how skilled nursing care is provided and paid for under Medicare.
• CI - Cigna Group, which has healthcare services and Medicare-related businesses that could be indirectly affected by shifts in post-acute care delivery.

Representative Adrian Smith Bill Proposals

Here are some bills which have recently been proposed by Representative Adrian Smith:

• H.R.11029: BRIDGE Care at Home Act
• H.R.10767: Fair Play Enforcement Act
• H.R.10706: Strengthening Innovation in Medicare and Medicaid Act
• H.R.10413: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to increase the qualified elementary and secondary education scholarships credit limit for married taxpayers filing a joint return.
• H.R.10412: To amend the Internal Revenue Code of 1986 to eliminate the State opt-in requirement for the qualified elementary and secondary education scholarship credit.
• H.R.8528: PI Post Acute Access Act

You can track bills proposed by Representative Adrian Smith on Investivoq's politician page for Smith.

Representative Adrian Smith Net Worth

Investivoq estimates that Representative Adrian Smith is worth $1.9M, as of November 14th, 2026. This is the 277th highest net worth in Congress, per our live estimates.

Smith has approximately $0 invested in publicly traded assets which Investivoq is able to track live.

You can track Representative Adrian Smith's net worth on Investivoq's politician page for Smith.

Representative Adrian Smith Stock Trading

We have data on up to $5.2M of trades from Representative Adrian Smith, which we parsed from STOCK Act filings.

You can track Representative Adrian Smith's stock trading on Investivoq's politician page for Smith.

2026 Nebraska's 3rd Congressional District Election

There has been approximately $2,965,691 of spending in Nebraska's 3rd congressional district elections over the last two years, per our estimates.

Approximately $282,975 of this has been from outside spending by PACs and Super PACs.

The rating for this race is currently "Solid R".

You can track this election on our matchup page for the 2026 Nebraska's 3rd congressional district election.

This article is not financial advice. See Investivoq's disclaimers for more information.